wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained

wasif twm case law Fundamentals Explained

Blog Article

Article 199 on the Constitution allows High Court intervention only when "no other ample remedy is provided by legislation." It is actually properly-settled that an aggrieved person must exhaust obtainable remedies before invoking High Court jurisdiction, regardless of whether those remedies suit them. The doctrine of exhaustion of remedies prevents unnecessary High Court litigation. Read more

Its enforcement with the provision of capital punishment or life imprisonment underscores the value of human life and the importance of maintaining legislation and order in society.

In this landmark case, the Supreme Court commuted the death sentence to life imprisonment around the grounds of extenuating circumstances. The court acknowledged that although the crime of murder was proven, the offender experienced a history of mental illness, which played a significant role in committing the offense. This case established a precedent for looking at mitigating factors during sentencing.

Within the dynamic realm of legal statutes, amendments play a crucial role in adapting to evolving circumstances and strengthening the legal framework. A single these types of notable amendment that has garnered attention would be the latest revision of Section 489-File of the Pakistan Penal Code (PPC).

3.  I have read the realized counsel for the parties and have long gone through the record of this case with their capable assistance.

Power to levy tax and to legislate on immovable property which includes tax on once-a-year rental value of immovable property after 18th Amendment(CONSTITUTION OF PAKISTAN, 1973)

only on the ground of miscases remanded & only over the ground of misreading of evidence only within the ground of misreading of evidence . disposed of(Sindh Rented Premises Ordinance, 1979)

The appellant should have remained vigilant and raised his challenge to the Judgment within time. Read more

This ruling has conditions, and For the reason that petitioners unsuccessful a qualifying Test, they cannot claim equity or this Court's jurisdiction based about the Niazi case analogy. nine. In view of the above mentioned facts and circumstances from the case, petitioners have not demonstrated a case for this court's intervention under Article 199 with the Constitution. Read more

This public interest litigation came before the Supreme Court of Pakistan when petitioners challenged the construction of a nearby electricity grid station on account of likely health risks and hazards.

The DCFS social worker in charge in the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her 6-thirty day period report on the court, the worker elaborated around the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to move him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

کیا ایف آئی آر درخواست گزار کی رپورٹ پر درج کی گئی تھی اور اگر ہاں تو کیا اسے اس کے خلاف ثبوت کے طور پر استعمال کیا جا سکتا ہے؟

This landmark case expanded the fundamental rights to life and dignity by interpreting these rights check here to encompass the right to the healthy environment. This decision is particularly significant as there aren't any specific provisions during the Pakistani Constitution regarding environmental protection. In relation to environmental law in Pakistan, it really is important that the case proven the application of your precautionary principle where there is usually a threat to environmental rights, and emphasized the positive obligations in the State in protecting the right to some clean and healthy environment.

The residents argued that the high-voltage grid station would pose a health risk and possible hazard to local residents. Finally, the court determined the scientific evidence inconclusive, when observing the general pattern supports that electromagnetic fields have unfavorable effects on human health. The Court accepted the petitioner’s argument that it should adopt the precautionary principle established out from the 1992 Rio Declaration to the Environment and Progress, the first international instrument that linked environment protection with human rights, whereby The shortage of full scientific certainty should not be used like a reason to prevent environmental degradation.